Dom the Conservative
While the U.S. continues to reel from minorities requiring
halal slaughter, rainbow cakes, and a $15 minimum wage, national
security is taking a hit with the vociferous demands of the Muslim 2
percent. In fact, one state’s appeasement of burqa-clad women threatens
to fundamentally change the value of the driver’s license as an
identification tool.
The
International Business Times
reports that fliers reminding employees of the Department of Motor
Vehicle offices that it is illegal for them to request that applicants
remove “articles of faith” for their driver’s license photos in the
state of Illinois.
“While hats or head coverings are generally prohibited from
being worn in photographs used on Illinois driver’s licenses and
identification cards, customers may be photographed while wearing
established religious head coverings,” read the flier. “Photographs
increase public safety.”
Deputy Press Secretary Henry Haupt of Illinois confirmed
that Muslims and Sikhs will be allowed to wear obtrusive headwear in
their photos,
Fusion reports. Even the burqa and veil are considered acceptable, although they cover every identifiable feature.
Can
you tell if the woman under the burqa is the same person as the one on
the drivers license? Can you even tell for sure that this is a woman?
“What we’re doing was always allowed the religious head
coverings of this nature but what we want to ensure is that the public’s
aware of them because we were told that some individuals were unaware
that they could have their photo taken for the drivers [sic] license
wearing them. We’re always mindful of the fact that we want to
communicate well with the public,” Haupt said.
The fact of the matter is that a driver’s license isn’t just
an issued card that acknowledges your right to operate a vehicle. We’re
talking about the value of the biggest identification tool becoming a
worthless card. No, not a worthless card — a weapon with which those who
seek to commit crimes can gain access to places where they might
otherwise be denied.
The
burqa covers every inch of skin, often including the eyes. How does the
DMV know the woman in the photo is Fatima Khomeini? How would
authorities know?
If anyone needed an ID to gain entrance, literally anyone
could dress in the burqa and use this ID. The photo holds absolutely no
value, and it may as well be removed entirely. No longer will there be a
way to confirm someone’s identity by their license.
This brings us back to the topic of banning the burqa as a
step towards national security. It is impossible to know who or what is
hiding beneath the burqa, and neither security cameras nor security
guards can identify perpetrators unless their face is visible. Allowing
the burqa simply because an intolerant ideology requires women to be
repressed by covering their entire existence for the sake of tolerance
is tolerating that repression.
Having
Muslim remove headwear in photos isn’t enough if they’re wearing
identity-concealing clothing in public. The burqa is a security threat
that must be banned.
While trying to crack down on discrimination, the state has
officially discriminated against everyone who’s religion doesn’t require
them to wear hindering headwear. Only if one is a Muslim, Sikh, or
perhaps other may they wear this identity-concealing fashion. For all
others, this is illegal, and they must remove it for their photos.
The DMV wouldn’t allow someone to walk into the office with a
Halloween mask or ski mask on, much less let them wear either in their
photo, so why do we make an exception for a religious group? What’s
next? The Ku Klux Klan wearing white sheets and carrying flaming crosses
in their photos, in accordance with their backwards beliefs?
What has happened in Illinois is an example of religion
being acknowledged as a higher form of governance than our government,
all because our wonderful country is so tolerant and open-minded.
However, the tolerance of intolerance is cultural suicide, and our
Constitution is headed towards the same cliff.
Comments
Post a Comment