Dawn Parabellum
Barack Obama’s executive orders on
gun control have angered the law-abiding gun owners in the country, and
because of these actions, a hearing is now in progress to discuss
whether he violated the constitutional rights of Americans. However, one
liberal Democrat has decided that the answer to making sure Obama’s
executive action goes through is to ignore the Constitution, and she’s
entirely serious.
It’s cute when liberal use words they don’t understand, like
“Constitution,” “rights,” or “guns.” But to go so far as to say no
constitutional discussion is to be had about gun rights on the executive
orders is new low, even for Democrats. Unfortunately, that’s exactly
what’s happened, as a member of our own United States Congress is
avoiding a discussion about the very Constitution they’ve sworn to
uphold.
Maryland Senator Barbara Mikulski said, “So let’s solve the problem. Let’s not get involved in constitutional arguments,
and let’s help our American people be safe and secure in their home,
their neighborhood, their school, and their house of worship.”
Barbara Mikulski, (D) -Maryland
How exactly does this Democrat propose that a hearing
discussing Obama’s unconstitutional executive actions on gun rights and
the Second Amendment proceed without discussing the constitutional
rights outlined in the Constitution? Logic is entirely wasted here.
Unfortunately, Mikuslki didn’t stop there. In her completely
irrational and totalitarian tirade, she went on to pat Loretta Lynch’s
backside. Lynch is the fascist Attorney General who replaced the
freedom-trampling and incompetent Eric Holder, and like Mikuslki and
Obama, she is a die-hard supporter of the disarmament of America.
Mikuslki looks forward to hearing more from Lynch, and Lynch is
confident that Obama’s “pen and phone” moment, in which he signed away
your rights, was well within the laws already established.
While Democrats seek to avoid the Constitution and honoring
the rights of Americans at all cost, Republicans are stepping up for
us. “The department is on notice,” Alabama Senator Richard Shelby told
Lynch. “This subcommittee will have no part in undermining the
Constitution and the rights that it protects.” Even
Donald Trump said he’d undo these executive orders if he becomes the next president.
Democrats should all attempt to read a dictionary. I know,
it’s hard, but they might learn something. It isn’t all that difficult
to see that executive orders, redefining laws about the Second Amendment
of our Constitution, are not only unconstitutional, but by the very
definition, constitutional arguments against it are necessary to prove
its unconstitutionality. Perhaps liberals should worry more about the
terrorists finding their way into the country, rather than restricting
the rights of its civilians to defend themselves against said
terrorists.
Comments
Post a Comment