Rebecca Diserio
Hillary Clinton is trying to appeal to the masses as a
moderate Democrat. Now that she’s pretty much locked in the nomination,
she is pulling back on her far left tactics and trying to transform, so
she can grab independent voters. However, Hillary’s biggest secrets is
something that will leave most voters convinced she is not just a liar,
but she is a threat to liberty itself. This is one thing the Clintons
have tried to hide for years, but it’s time every voter knows about it.
Saul Alinsky (left), Hillary Rodham Clinton (right)
In 1992, when Bill Clinton served as President of the United States,
many journalists wanted to start biographies on the Clintons. Knowing
that something in Hilary’s past would come to light,
they tried to coerce her professor, Alan H. Schechter, into burying her senior thesis.
So, what was so damning about a senior thesis that the
Clintons would need to threaten someone to cover it up? It was Hillary’s
masterpiece, and it shows exactly who she is politically. Hillary wrote
her thesis on Saul Alinsky, the father of all radicals who hate America
and want to burn it to the ground.
But in 1993, Wellesley removed the thesis from circulation.
In 1995, the college, citing the fact that theses are copyrighted,
adopted a rule: the senior thesis of any president or first lady should
not be publicly available. So far, the rule has applied only to Clinton.
[via
Boston.com]
Of course it only applies to Hillary Clinton. If it got out,
it would provide so much crap that could be slung at her, and her
political career would not survive. Saul Alinsky coined the term radical
as one who will go to any lengths to reach their goals. Alinsky taught
infiltration is the way to change things, and he encouraged lying to
further the goal.
Hillary and Alinsky exchanged letters, and here is a little known
letter that Hillary sent to Alinsky, giving away her true motives:
“You’re being re-discovered again as the New
Left-type politico radicals are finally beginning to think seriously
about the hard work and seriousness of organizing. I seem to have
survived law school, slightly bruised, with my belief for and zest in
organizing intact..The more I’ve seen of places like Yale Law school and
those that haunt them, the more I’m convinced that we have the serious
business of such work ahead…” [via
Political Insider]
Organizing is what it is all about. This is the social
justice movement of Black Lives Matter, it is to make people violently
demonstrate and turn things into chaos. Alinsky and Hillary Clinton are
chaos agents, wanting to transform America into a socialistic
communistic state.
Hillary will try to convince people that she is not like Obama. In fact, Hillary’s campaign already has
Bill saying bad
things about Obama. “If you believe we’ve finally come to the point
where we can put the awful legacy of the last eight years behind us, …
then you should vote for her,” Bill said.
If people knew that in electing Hillary, they were electing
someone far worse than Obama, that would matter. Sure, most
conservatives know this, it’s those
independent voters that need convincing.
Comments
Post a Comment