After key donations, GOP tried to keep poisoned kids from suing lead makers
on
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Beth Mole
Between 2011 and 2012, large, secret
donations from the billionaire owner of one of America’s leading lead
producers provided critical support to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker
and the Republican-led legislature as they weathered recall elections.
Not coincidentally, around that time the lawmakers passed two laws that
would effectively make it impossible for childhood victims of lead
poisoning to sue lead companies, according to leaked documents obtained by The Guardian.
Since the laws were passed, federal courts
have overturned key elements of them, ruling them unconstitutional and
allowing legal challenges to go forward. However, if the laws had stayed
in effect, they would have spared lead industries from potentially
paying out millions in damages to hundreds of victims who were exposed
to extremely high doses of the poisonous metal through paint during
childhood.
“These children were perfectly innocent. They
entered life with all the gifts and health that God gave them and were
devastated by this neurotoxin,” Peter Earle, the principal attorney on
171 cases that are currently ongoing against lead producers and lead
paint manufacturers, told The Guardian.
Lead was banned from household paints in the US in 1978, decades after the lead industry was aware of the toxicity of its product.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has since noted that
there is no safe level of lead for children, in which the toxic metal
causes learning and developmental disabilities. Lead blood levels of 5
micrograms per deciliter or higher are now considered concerning for
kids—as was the case in many Flint, Michigan, children. Yet, one of the
plaintiffs represented by Earle, named Yasmin Clark, had levels of 48
micrograms per deciliter as a child due to exposure to lead paint in her
house in Milwaukee.
Under the two Wisconsin laws, Clark’s
negligence suit would have been thrown out. The first of the laws,
enacted in early 2011, required any new alleged victim to definitively
prove that the company they were suing was responsible for making the
exact paint that they inhaled or ingested at the time of their
poisoning—basically an impossible feat given multiple paint layers
within houses and exposures that occurred long ago in childhood. The
second law, slipped into a 2013 budget bill at the last minute, made
sure the rule applied not just to new lawsuits, but pending ones as
well. Together, the laws would render lead producers and lead paint
manufacturers effectively immune to all lawsuits.
According to the leaked documents—which were assembled during a state investigation
into alleged campaign finance violations—the GOP got several key
donations in between those two legislative moves. Harold Simmons, the
billionaire owner of NL industries, a leading producer of lead
previously used for lead paints, wrote three checks, totaling $750,000,
during that time. The checks were made out to the Wisconsin Club for
Growth, then run by one of Gov. Walker’s top advisors.
Simmons already had a reputation of getting
off the hook for paying damages to lead poisoning victims and had gained
notoriety in Texas for dumping toxic waste. The document also revealed
that Walker’s advisors cautioned him about these “red flags.” However
the warnings weren’t enough to keep the lawmakers from cashing Simmons’
checks.
In 2014, a federal court overturned parts of the laws, calling them unconstitutional, and reinstated lawsuits against lead companies.
Lead-based paint and lead-toting dust from crumbling paint remain the leading source of lead poisoning in the US.
The CDC estimates that about 24 million homes in the country are
contaminated, more than 4 million of which house one or more children.
Comments
Post a Comment