Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
on
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Jon Brodkin
Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential
election might be big trouble for AT&T’s attempt to buy Time Warner,
and it could even threaten Comcast’s 5-year-old acquisition of
NBCUniversal.
We can’t be certain that Trump will follow
through on statements he made during his campaign or whether the people
he appoints as regulators will achieve Trump’s desired outcomes. But we
do know that just a few weeks ago, Trump said he intends to block the
AT&T/Time Warner deal and wants the government to consider breaking
up Comcast and NBC.
In a speech in October,
Trump declared his opposition to both mergers while discussing his
dislike of how media organizations covered the election. News
organizations were trying to “suppress my vote and the voice of the
American people,” Trump said.
“As an example of the power structure I'm
fighting, AT&T is buying Time Warner and thus CNN, a deal we will
not approve in my administration because it's too much concentration of
power in the hands of too few,” he said.
Shortly after, Trump declared that Comcast shouldn’t be allowed to own NBC.
“Comcast's purchase of NBC concentrated far
too much power in one massive entity that is trying to tell the voters
what to think and what to do,” Trump said. “Deals like this
destroy democracy and we'll look at breaking that deal up and other
deals like that. That should never, ever have been approved in the first
place, they're trying to poison the mind of the American voter."
But now that Trump has won, it isn't clear that his administration will follow through.
“It’s just impossible to know,” Harold Feld,
senior VP of consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge, told Ars today.
“Trump has said a lot of contradictory things. There are things that he
says that he may not have the capacity to do, but it's impossible to
know at this point how real his populist rhetoric is going to be in
terms of policy.”
The conservative wing of the Republican party
that would be expected to approve AT&T/Time Warner "lost very
thoroughly in the primaries," Feld noted. But the Republicans serving on
the FCC today, Ajit Pai and Michael O'Rielly, don't seem likely to lead
opposition to the merger.
"The ideal FCC chairman or commissioner for
Trump would have to be somebody who is pro-regulatory in a lot of ways
and anti-regulatory in a lot of ways," Feld said. At this point, the
merger's fate in Washington is "a big maybe," he said.
Doug Brake, a telecommunications policy
analyst at the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation,
agreed that Trump's campaign statement isn't necessarily a guarantee
that he will try to stop the merger.
"Part
of Trump’s election strategy was staying unpredictable—it was hard to
pin him down on even some of his most prominent policy positions," Brake
told Ars. "So it is unclear how strongly he feels about an
AT&T/Time Warner tie-up or really any other telecommunications
issue. That said, he was quite clear in his distaste for the merger, and
no doubt the odds of its successful completion are lower this morning
than yesterday."
AT&T's $85.4 billion purchase of Time
Warner—a company that is completely separate from the similarly named
Time Warner Cable—will be reviewed by the Department of Justice and likely by the Federal Communications Commission.
Even if the DOJ doesn't have a strong legal
case against the merger, after Trump nominates an attorney general he
could issue “instructions to try to pursue something anyway,” Feld said.
But there is a big difference between Trump
opposing a merger and actually blocking it. "A president cannot simply
block a merger by fiat," Brake said. "The Department of Justice would
have to bring suit and win in court, or if it does end up in front of
the FCC, a Trump chairman could potentially send it to an administrative
law judge or propose such onerous conditions that the parties abandon
the deal. Either way, this will not be an immediate process."
When contacted by Ars about Trump’s opposition
to the merger, AT&T pointed to comments made this morning by
AT&T CFO John Stephens. “From a company perspective, we really look
forward to working with President-elect Trump and his transition team,”
Stephens said. “His policies and his discussions about infrastructure
investment, economic development, and American innovation all fit right
in with AT&T's goals.”
The AT&T/Time Warner deal “is all about
innovation and economic development, consumer choice, and investment in
infrastructure with regard to providing a great 5G mobile broadband
experience,” Stephens said.
Forcing Comcast and NBC to split is a tall order
Breaking up Comcast/NBC would be more
complicated than stopping AT&T/Time Warner because the companies
already merged in 2011 after a lengthy review by the DOJ and FCC, which
imposed conditions to mitigate the merger’s potential effects on
competitors.
The most famous government-initiated telecom breakup in the US, of course, was the breakup of the AT&T Bell System
during President Ronald Reagan’s first term. The Bell System breakup
was initiated by the DOJ, which could theoretically take the same role
against Comcast/NBC under Trump.
“AT&T is the classic breakup case,”
economist Hal Singer, a senior fellow at George Washington Institute of
Public Policy, told Ars. “You could go after [Comcast/NBC]. But what's
weird is [Trump] would have to appoint folks who kind of fit in that
populist framework and it doesn’t seem to me that he’s going there.”
“He's been appointing people who are fairly
traditional conservatives, but he's been running on this populist notion
of going after big companies and concentration of media,” Singer
said. The fate of AT&T/Time Warner will also depend heavily on
Trump's appointments, he said.
It's not just the DOJ that could take aim at
Comcast/NBC, Feld said. The FCC could break the company up by imposing
rules that limit telecom and media consolidation, he said.
“There are a number of means through which the
FCC could, by rulemakings, force open the programming contracts, limit
the size of the cable operators, go after the bundle of services with
rules about cross-ownership of broadcast stations and cable and
programming networks and broadband,” Feld said.
But Trump is also a declared opponent of net neutrality rules who has promised
to issue a temporary moratorium on federal regulations in general. In
the telecom policy world, regulators who oppose net neutrality
and increased regulation of ISPs aren’t usually the ones trying to stop
big telecom mergers.
To break up Comcast and NBC, “you’d have to have an FCC that was much more activist than the [Tom] Wheeler FCC," Feld said.
Comcast declined comment when contacted by Ars.
Populist rhetoric from Trump could end up
giving way to a more traditional antitrust review that weighs the
competitive effects of a merger. Singer pointed out in a recent article
on AT&T/Time Warner that “in the world inhabited by regulators,
antitrust lawyers, and economists… merger policy is based on the strict
application of rules and precedent to the specific facts of the case.”
But it’s still possible that Trump could
appoint a DOJ chief who is willing to pursue Trump’s “personal vendetta”
against certain media organizations, Singer said. In the same speech in
which Trump criticized telecom mergers, he took aim at Amazon’s
relationship with The Washington Post. “Amazon, which through its ownership controls The Washington Post,
should be paying massive taxes it’s not paying," Trump said. "It’s a
very unfair playing field and you see what that's doing to department
stores all over the country."
Amazon does not own the Post, but the paper is owned by Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos. In any case, Trump’s criticism about Amazon and the Post “is not a traditional antitrust concern. It sounds like more of a personal vendetta,” Singer said.
FCC Chairman Wheeler, a Democrat, is likely to
step down from his chairmanship after Trump is inaugurated. Trump would
then appoint a successor, giving Republicans a majority on the FCC.
We’ll have more coverage of the upcoming transition in the near future.
Comments
Post a Comment