Paul Mozer
HONG KONG — China is home to the world’s largest group of internet users, a
thriving online technology scene and rampant software piracy that encapsulates its determination to play
by its own set of digital rules.
But as the country scrambles to recover from
a global hacking
assault that hit its companies, government agencies and universities
especially hard, the risks of its dependence on pirated software are
becoming clear.
Researchers
believe large numbers of computers running unlicensed versions of
Windows probably contributed to the reach of the so-called ransomware
attack, according to the Finnish cybersecurity company F-Secure. Because
pirated software usually is not registered with the developer, users
often miss major security patches that could ward off assaults.
It
is not clear whether every company or institution in China affected by
the ransomware, which locked users out of their computers and demanded
payment to allow them to return, was using pirated software. But
universities, local governments and state-run companies probably have
networks that depend on unlicensed copies of Windows.
Microsoft
and other Western companies have complained for years about widespread
use of pirated software in a number of countries that were hit
particularly hard by the attack. A
study last year by BSA,
a trade association of software vendors, found that 70 percent of
software installed on computers in China was not properly licensed in
2015. Russia, at 64 percent, and India, 58 percent, were close behind.
Zhu
Huanjie, who is studying network engineering in Hangzhou, China, blamed
a number of ills for the spread of the attack, including the lack of
security on school networks. He said piracy was also a factor. Many
users, he said, did not update their software to get the latest safety
features because of a fear that their copies would be damaged or locked,
while universities offered only older, pirated versions.
“Most
of the schools are now all using pirate software, including operation
system and professional software,” he said. “In China, the Windows that
most people are using is still pirated. This is just the way it is.”
On
Monday, some Chinese institutions were still cleaning computer systems
jammed by the attack. Prestigious research institutions like Tsinghua
University were affected, as were major companies like China Telecom and
Hainan Airlines.
China’s
securities regulator said it had taken down its network to try to
protect it, and the country’s banking regulator warned lenders to be
cautious when dealing with the malicious software.
Police stations
and
local security offices reported problems on social media, while
university students reported being locked out of final thesis papers.
Electronic payment systems at gas stations run by the state oil giant
PetroChina were cut off for much of the weekend. Over all, according to
the official state television broadcaster, about 40,000 institutions
were hit. Separately, the Chinese security company Qihoo 360 reported
that computers at more than 29,000 organizations had been infected.
At
China Telecom, one of the country’s three main state-run
telecommunications providers, a similar scramble occurred over the
weekend, according to an employee who was not authorized to speak on the
matter. When a company-provided software patch did not work, the
employee was told to use one from Qihoo 360, which supports pirated and
out-of-date versions of Windows, the person said. A spokesman for China
Telecom did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
On
Monday, the main internet regulator, the Cyberspace Administration of
China, quoted an unidentified person in charge of internet security
saying that the ransomware was still spreading but the speed of
transmission had slowed. It said that regulators overseeing banks,
schools, the police and other groups had given orders to stop the risk
and that it had instructed users on how to avoid exposure.
Using
copied software and other media has become embedded in China’s
computing culture, said Thomas Parenty, founder of Archefact Group,
which advises companies on cybersecurity. Some people are under the
impression that using pirated goods in China is legal, while others are
simply not used to paying for software, he said.
Mr.
Parenty cited an instance when he was working at the Beijing office of
an American client. “It turned out every single one of their computers,
all the software, was bootlegged,” he said.
The
twin problems of malware and the unwillingness to pay for software are
so ingrained that they have led to an alternative type of security
company in China. Qihoo 360 built its business by offering free security
programs; it makes money from advertising.
The issue has led to political battles between Microsoft and the Chinese government.
In
a bid to get more organizations in China to pay for their software,
Microsoft, which is based in Redmond, Wash., has tried education and
outreach. It has also stopped distributing Windows on discs, which are
easy to copy.
One effort in 2014 put it at loggerheads with Beijing.
At
that time, Microsoft cut off support for Windows XP, an operating
system that was about 14 years old but that was still widely used by the
government and by Chinese companies. Many in China complained that the
move showed that the country still relied on decisions made by foreign
companies. An article by the official news agency Xinhua said that such
corporate behavior could be considered anticompetitive. Microsoft later
agreed to offer
free upgrades and reached a deal with a state-run company that often works for the military to develop a version that catered to China.
The
Chinese government has been less focused on software piracy — and more
on building local alternatives to Microsoft. After leaks by the former
intelligence contractor Edward J. Snowden about American hacking attacks
aimed at monitoring China’s military buildup, leaders in Beijing
accelerated a push to develop Chinese-branded software and hardware that
would be harder to breach.
For
now, however, much of China relies on Windows. And for all of the
impact of the weekend’s cyberattack, Mr. Parenty said he did not think
that there would be a big effect on attitudes toward pirated software.
“The
only way I see this changing things is if the central government
decides there is a risk to critical infrastructure from this threat and
force people to buy legitimate software,” he said. “But I don’t see that
happening right now.”
Comments
Post a Comment