Following a decade running LendingClub, Laplanche uses lessons learned for his next startup
Conor Witt1
Renaud LaPlanche, Lending Club
Renaud Laplanche spent ten years building LendingClub. In the process,
he created an industry from scratch. Circumventing conventional banking
channels for consumer credit began in 1996 when Chris Larsen started
E-LOAN, which ultimately led to Prosper Marketplace. But LendingClub,
which Laplanche founded in 2007, was and remains the poster child for
the business of marketplace lending. The industry’s short history has
been volatile, characterized by both triumphant hype and utter lack of
confidence.
History of the Marketplace Lending Industry, CB Insights
While LendingClub has struggled in the public markets since their late
2014 IPO, they have managed to propel their industry into significance,
while rapidly expanding their share of the personal loan market to 10%.
After his well-publicized departure in May 2016, Laplanche got started
on his next venture in a hurry. Just a few months later he started
Credify, ultimately renamed to Upgrade, a company that bears a striking
resemblance to LendingClub. In just two years Upgrade has raised $142
million in funding, while originating more than $1 billion in loans
since August 2017.
With Upgrade, Laplanche has the opportunity to start fresh with the
benefit of hindsight. The initial promise of LendingClub and their
competitors was unbundling the banks. Now, to persist and grow,
marketplace lenders have realized they need to rebundle, providing an
array of bank-like services to better serve their end customers. This
post explores what Laplanche is doing differently this time with
Upgrade.
Total Addressable Market ≠ Value Capture
There has been a general recognition across many fintech businesses that
marketplace business models aren’t enough. The mutually-beneficial
arrangement of marketplace lending is a perfect example. Superior
customer experience, expedited loan decision, quick receipt of funds,
and lower operational costs without legacy infrastructure were the
selling points. Charles Moldow famously called it a “trillion-dollar
opportunity” in 2014.
He may still be right, but in order to realize the opportunity,
marketplace lenders need to capture a larger, more regular share of
borrower’s attention. Loans may be high-volume purchases, but they’re
not high-frequency transactions. So when a platform like LendingClub
facilitates a loan so someone can refinance their outstanding credit
card debt, is there really a relationship with the customer there?
Capital is provided, customer service is available, and monthly payments
are made. That’s all there is to it.
Total addressable market (TAM) is frequently used to assess opportunity.
A critical part of the TAM estimation process might have been
overlooked in the early assessments of the alternative lending industry.
The large numbers in the figure below reflect an alluring market that
LendingClub, Prosper, Avant, Upstart, OneMain, Best Egg and others have
attempted to capitalize upon.
The notion of a replacement cycle, which I’ll borrow from Michael
Mauboussin, is an important consideration here, particularly in a high
volume, low frequency transaction relationship such as consumer lending.
Just because a borrower refinances their credit card debt with a loan
from LendingClub, there’s little guarantee that all of the money spent
on acquiring that customer will lead to future transactions with that
customer. Yet, in order for these companies to succeed, the average
revenue per user (ARPU) is going to have to rise through some
combination of repeat customers and complementary services to deepen the
relationship and create new revenue channels.
The market opportunity for marketplace Lenders, LendingClub Investor Day 2017
With this realization in mind, fintech players across the board have
focused on deepening relationships with customers to drive sales and
lower SG&A costs. Customer acquisition is a major component of the
income statement for these companies. The more engagement a lender has
with their end customer, the greater the chance they stand to not only
be called upon when a borrower needs to borrow again, but ultimately
pinpoint opportunities for product recommendations.
And that’s exactly what Upgrade is doing. In many ways, they’re quite
similar to LendingClub. Upgrade offers personal loans between $1,000 and
$50,000 over three-to-five-year repayment periods at rates competitive
with major banks. LendingClub varies a bit in the principal amount
offerings and APRs, but they essentially do the same thing. Loans are
originated through WebBank, the partner bank that also works with
LendingClub. Operationally, there’s a blockchain component for data
remediation and security purposes. However, the extent and value of this
application are unclear.
Marrying Credit with Financial Wellness
The notion of financial wellness is increasingly popular among consumer
fintech companies, as well as incumbent financial institutions. It
reflects a transition away from a purely transactional relationship to a
fiduciary one, as we’ve also seen in the wealth management industry.
The tricky thing about this is that although it may be the right thing
to do, late fees and overdraft penalties make up a sizeable portion of
traditional bank revenue.
Where Upgrade differs from LendingClub is in their customer engagement
model. Upgrade provides several features to customers that resemble a
conventional personal financial management (PFM) app. Their Credit
Health service offers free advice and monitoring tools, personalized
recommendations, and customized updates for individual credit scores and
underlying rationale. Additionally, they offer a financial education
tool open to the public called Credit Health Insights, which offers tips
and tricks for debt management and financial wellness. At the surface,
there’s little differentiation here. A free credit score is becoming
table stakes for any financial institution, and personalized insights
are to be expected.
Upgrade’s borrower value proposition, LendIt 2018 Conference
In Upgrade’s case, however, the framing of the dual service is
compelling. Typically, online lenders only approve 10-15% of applicants.
While the credit underwriting models are looking for the most
compelling borrower profiles who will pay back their loans, the majority
of interested borrowers are sent back to the drawing board.
A major focus of Upgrade is to build the credit of the other 85-90% of
applicants who are typically rejected so that they improve their profile
and obtain a loan in the future. Credit repair and financial wellness
are underserved markets today, although companies like Bloom Credit are
working to change the record. This product combination helps to unify
the interests of Upgrade and borrowers, both approved and rejected.
Reinventing Consumer Credit?
At the LendIt Conference in 2017, Laplanche concluded his presentation
with a reference to the Wright Brothers. He discussed how he was
enamored with their ability to combine two things to create something
entirely new, which in their case was “wheeling and flying.” A year
later, he returned to LendIt with a new product release that borrowed
from the innovation strategy of Orville and Wilbur.
Upgrade launched a first of its kind product, a Personal Credit Line, a
hybrid of a credit card and an unsecured loan. Here’s how it works:
customers get approved for up to $50,000 in credit, from which they can
draw down as needed. They only pay interest on what’s borrowed, over the
course of a 12-60-month timeframe. The interest rate is also fixed over
the term of the loan.
Upgrade’s Personal Credit Line, a hybrid of a personal loan and a credit card, Upgrade
The product is built on the premise that the level of innovation in the
origination of consumer credit has been somewhat limited. Laplanche
attempted to reinvent it once with the creation of LendingClub. In some
ways, it worked. Personal loans originated by fintech lenders account
for roughly a third of outstanding consumer loans according to
Transunion. Now he’s trying to do it again.
First Mover Disadvantage in Consumer Fintech
When I first read the press release for the Personal Credit Line, I
thought it was a very compelling way to expand the menu of options to
qualified consumers. It puts more control in the hands of the borrower,
so they can avoid the vicious cycle of consumer debt. I was also
reminded of a comment made by Josh Brown, CEO of Ritholtz Wealth
Management, after Wealthfront released their “Portfolio Line of Credit”
product in April 2017. He said that while it might sound flashy, there’s
nothing holding Schwab or Fidelity back from offering the same product
tomorrow.
What’s so challenging about consumer-facing fintech companies is that
customers are expensive to acquire, they’re difficult to keep, and
products are easy to replicate. Providing a free credit score is easily
accessible through a partnership with Equifax or Experian. It’s
commoditized. The situation is similar with personal financial
management tools. This Personal Credit Line seems awfully similar.
What’s to stop Chase or Goldman’s Marcus from offering an identical
product, perhaps with even better rates? U.S. Bank just launched a
similar product, albeit for a different use case, called Simple Loan.
It’s a $100 to $1,000 loan marketed as a payday lending alternative,
with a roughly 20% lower interest rate than typical payday lender
offers.
There is something to be said for being first to market, but ease of
replication limits the defensibility of that position. There is a clear
interest in an expansion into new products, which will continue to help
Upgrade to differentiate the value proposition to consumers, and maybe
one day small businesses. The unfortunate reality is that bigger players
with an existing customer base and a lower cost of capital are on their
tail.
Forget about Democratization
Renaud Laplanche rings the bell with his team at LendingClub (DON EMMERT/AFP/Getty Images)
The real insight that distinguishes Upgrade from LendingClub is the
profile of the users. On the supply side of the marketplace, Upgrade
only welcomes institutional investors. LendingClub was, and still is,
marketed to individuals and institutions.
The peer-to-peer model turned out to be a little too idealistic to serve
as the foundation for a business. The concept of a marketplace is
really attractive – the ability to invest in others, as cliché as that
may sound, has a philanthropic twist to it that even implies a social
good. Or, at the very least, an alignment of interests. Except interests
aren’t aligned because of the mercurial nature of retail investors,
which makes for unstable sources of capital.
LendingClub’s original business model, in the pure P2P form, was reliant
on the ability to create a new asset class. The notion of investing in
consumer credit may sound compelling, and return prospects may be even
more appealing. But, you can’t bootstrap an asset class and base a
business model around retail adoption. LendingClub had to solve for
distribution of their service, as well as the dissemination of the
broader concept of unsecured consumer lending as an asset class.
On Laplanche’s second go around with Upgrade, there’s no more promise of
democratization of a new asset class. Instead, large
multi-billion-dollar credit investors own the supply side of the
marketplace. As a result, there’s a more stable capital base of
institutional investors who know what they’re investing in and the
reason why they’re investing in it.
What Laplanche did this time around was base his business model around
stability. In this market it can pay to be a follower. LendingClub touts
the notion that they have “brought a new asset class to investors,” but
that education campaign came at a serious cost. It also invited boiler
room-like sales behavior from competitors. Upgrade is stepping in after a
decade of marketing to scale an untested industry to the masses.
Fortunately, a lot of the work has already been done for them.
How Different Can You Be?
Upgrade is led by as experienced and forward-thinking of a leader as
they come in the marketplace lending industry. They expect to originate
over $2 billion loans in 2018 and hit profitability by year-end as well.
They’re redefining convention when it comes to consumer credit
products.
The question, however, remains: how long can the novelty last? Consumer
fintech is fiercely competitive. It’s also increasingly occupied by
incumbents with far lower costs of capital, large existing customer
bases, and the ability to experiment in a way that a startup cannot. The
unsecured consumer lending space has attracted mountains of capital in
the past five years, but the opportunity is clearly defined. The number
of lenders issuing more than 10,000 personal loans per year has more
than doubled since 2011.
There’s a network effect component to marketplace lending businesses,
particularly as lenders are able to maintain more connected
relationships with consumers. But when it comes to standing apart from
the rest of the pack, a differentiated product offering isn’t a very
wide moat.
https://www.geezgo.com/sps/40259
Join Geezgo for free. Use Geezgo's end-to-end encrypted Chat with your Closenets (friends, relatives, colleague etc) in personalized ways.>>
Comments
Post a Comment