FBI probes Mexican, European firms over Venezuela oil trading - sources
on
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Marianna Parraga10-13 minutes
FILE
PHOTO: Oilfield workers hold a flag with the corporate logo of
Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA, in a drilling rig at an oil well
operated by them, in the oil rich Orinoco belt, April 16, 2015.
REUTERS/Carlos Garcia Rawlins
By Marianna Parraga, Matt Spetalnick and Ana Isabel Martinez
MEXICO
CITY/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The FBI is probing several Mexican and
European companies allegedly involved in trading Venezuelan oil as it
gathers information for a U.S. Treasury Department inquiry into possible
sanctions busting, according to four people familiar with the matter.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and special envoy for Venezuela
Elliott Abrams told reporters late last month the State and Treasury
departments were investigating whether several firms were violating
sanctions imposed on Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA since January
2019.
The sanctions are part of a campaign by Washington to
strangle the revenues of President Nicolas Maduro, which has failed to
break his grip on power. U.S. officials say privately that is a source
of frustration for President Donald Trump, whose administration has
tightened the implementation of sanctions in recent months.
Three
of the people who provided information to the FBI - who asked for
anonymity to discuss the matter - said the agency was investigating
three Mexican companies: Libre Abordo, Schlager Business Group, and
Grupo Jomadi Logistics & Cargo.
Reuters could find no record of Venezuelan oil purchases by those companies prior to sanctions.
The
three people also said the FBI was gathering information on two
Europe-based oil trading companies that do have a track record of
dealing in Venezuelan oil or selling fuel to PDVSA: Elemento Ltd and
Swissoil Trading SA.
One of the sources familiar with the
matter in Washington said any action against the Mexican and European
companies could be postponed or cancelled if the firms had already
halted trade with Venezuela.
The three others said the probe
by the Treasury and the State departments could potentially lead to
action in the coming weeks if they discovered a violation of sanctions.
A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice, which handles media
enquiries for the FBI, declined to comment, as did a State Department
spokesperson. The Treasury Department did not reply to a request for
comment.
Emails and phone calls seeking comment from Swissoil
went unanswered. Emails sent to an address on Jomadi’s website bounced
back.
Law firm Holman, Fenwick & Willan (HFW),
representing Elemento, said in a letter to Reuters after this story was
published on May 13 that its client “is not aware of any investigations
into it or its business” by the FBI, the U.S. Treasury’s Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) or any other body.
“Our client
does not currently trade oil of Venezuela origin or sell fuel to PDVSA,”
it said, adding that Elemento does not have any intention of doing so
in the future. “Our client goes to great lengths to ensure that its
business activities comply with applicable rules, regulations and
sanctions, including obtaining legal advice.”
Elemento and its lawyers did not respond to requests for comment prior to publication of the May 13 story.
In
a lawsuit in January 2020 in a British court, Tansy Shiptrade Inc
alleged Elemento had used its name without permission to load a cargo of
about 2 million barrels of Venezuelan crude in December 2019, according
to a judge’s ruling refusing Elemento’s request to be allowed to sell
the oil.
The judgement said Elemento had admitted using
Tansy’s name to receive the cargo but that Elemento had said it had
permission to do so and had asserted that Swissoil had acted as its
agent in the trade.
According to the judge’s ruling, Richard
Rothenberg, Elemento’s chief financial officer, said in an affidavit
that between 2016 and 2019 the firm carried out Venezuela-related trades
as part of an agreement with U.S.-based Castleton Commodities
International (CCI).
While CCI ceased its involvement due to
U.S. sanctions imposed on Venezuela in early 2019, Elemento did 13 more
trades on its own after that date, Rothenberg said, according to the
ruling. He did not provide dates for the trades.
Reuters was
unable to immediately reach Rothenberg for comment. CCI said Elemento
was its counterparty on petroleum trades until early 2019, but the U.S.
commodities firm said it ceased its trading participation before the
January 2019 sanctions on PDVSA.
Reuters could not establish
subsequent trading in Venezuelan oil by Elemento and Swissoil following
the disputed cargo, aboard Liberia-flagged tanker Respect.
OIL FOR FOOD
Libre Abordo and its affiliate Schlager said in a statement to Reuters,
citing legal experts they hired, that two contracts they signed in June
2019 with Venezuela’s Corporation for Foreign Trade (Corpovex) to
provide food and water trucks in exchange for Venezuelan crude - known
as an oil-for-food agreement - were permitted under the sanctions as
long as no cash payment reached Maduro’s government.
“Neither
Libre Abordo nor shipping companies hired to move PDVSA’s hydrocarbons
are the subject of sanctions,” read the statement.
The firms
declined to identify the legal experts but provided Reuters with their
interpretation of Venezuela sanctions, which the companies said they
sent to several shipping firms and other partners.
The
undated memorandum said the oil-for-food deal did not contravene U.S.
measures because Corpovex was not specifically named on the Treasury
Department’s list of sanctioned people and entities, unlike PDVSA, and
because there were exceptions under the sanctions for humanitarian
goods.
Neither Corpovex, PDVSA nor Venezuela’s trade ministry responded to requests for comment.
VENEZUELA RELIANT ON SWAP DEALS
The two small Mexican companies have emerged as the largest middlemen
for Venezuelan oil in recent months, according to internal PDVSA export
documents, reviewed by Reuters.
OPEC member Venezuela has
come to rely on trading oil and gold to pay for essential imports using
complicated swap agreements because Washington’s sanctions bar Maduro’s
government from using the U.S. financial system.
The PDVSA
export documents show that Libre Abordo and Schlager have quickly ramped
up trading of Venezuelan oil since receiving a first cargo in December,
after a second wave of U.S. sanctions in August 2019 barred non-U.S.
oil companies from doing business with PDVSA.
These secondary
sanctions blocked the U.S. property of anyone worldwide “materially
assisting” Venezuela’s government, including PDVSA and other
governmental bodies - though it did not specifically name Corpovex.
While the measures permitted shipments of food, clothing and medicines,
none of the Venezuela-related executive orders issued by Trump
specifically allowed oil-for-food agreements.
Whether that ambiguity potentially has created a loophole for companies is a matter of disagreement, some experts said.
Richard Nephew, a senior researcher at Columbia University’s Center
on Global Energy Policy and a former State Department official dealing
with sanctions policy toward Iran, said that while food deals were
permitted under sanctions there was no special dispensation for them to
be paid for in oil and the involvement of PDVSA could still prompt
Treasury to take action.
However, Peter Harrell, an expert on
sanctions at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), said that
in oil-for-food swaps the companies ultimately supplying the food could
be protected from sanctions provided they had no role in physically
receiving, transporting or selling the oil.
Harrell added
that some U.S. policymakers might be reluctant to impose sanctions on
companies involved in a deal to supply basic goods to a nation suffering
a humanitarian crisis.
“Policymakers will be concerned that
sanctioning an oil for food barter would play into a...narrative that
U.S. sanctions are causing humanitarian challenges in Venezuela,”
Harrell said.
DECISIONS ON SANCTIONS
The third
Mexican company, Grupo Jomadi, held talks with PDVSA to swap 5 million
barrels of Venezuelan crude for imports of gasoline, according to an
unsigned contract dated in March reviewed by Reuters. Venezuela’s
refineries have long been crippled by outages, and the country has
suffered dire shortages of fuels since the sanctions were imposed.
Two sources told Reuters that Jomadi may have reached an agreement on
the swap deal as a crude cargo that departed from Venezuela in April
appeared to form part of it, according to the initial information
collected by U.S. authorities. Neither Jomadi nor PDVSA responded to
requests for comment.
Reuters was unable to independently confirm if the swap deal took place.
While the FBI’s principal focus is on domestic intelligence and
security, its agents also carry out overseas investigations to aid
decisions on sanctions by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign
Assets Control, which often also seeks input from the State and Commerce
departments, U.S. embassies and the intelligence community.
Libre
Abordo and Schlager’s oil-for-food deals with Venezuela obliged them to
deliver 1,000 water trucks and 210,000 tonnes of corn to the country,
the companies said. While some of the trucks have been delivered, the
firms said they have not so far supplied any of the food as low oil
prices have affected the original delivery schedule.
In
exchange, they have so far received more than 26 million barrels of
Venezuelan oil for resale, according to PDVSA’s export documents.
In
just four months, Libre Abordo and Schlager increased their intake of
PDVSA’s oil from less than 3% to 39% of the Venezuelan company’s total
exports, which averaged 850,000 barrels per day in April.
The
agreements threw a lifeline to Maduro, whose administration is
struggling to afford imports of everything from food to medicine and
industrial equipment.
Comments
Post a Comment