Will minority programmers be hurt or helped by a Federal
Communications Commission plan to boost competition in the set-top box
market?
That's one of the most contentious questions raised since FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler proposed rules
that would make TV channels available on more third-party devices and
applications. Wheeler's aim is to give consumers more choices beyond the
set-top boxes rented from cable providers. But those third-party
systems might not display minority content as prominently as traditional
cable TV systems, according to cable lobbyists and minority programmers
that oppose the plan.
Wheeler contended the opposite in a letter
to members of Congress. Cable TV companies are shutting out minority
programmers today, but the proposed set-top box rules will make it
easier for viewers to find minority programming, Wheeler argues. Wheeler
also said he will continue with the rulemaking proceeding despite calls
for a delay.
"As the video ecosystem evolves it should be creating more
opportunities for independent and minority-owned programming," Wheeler
wrote. "By using the set-top box as a way to limit program
carriage, however, MVPDs [multichannel video programming distributors]
constrict opportunities. While the most popular MVPD packages contain
200 to 500 channels, there are currently only two Hispanic-owned and
four African-American owned networks. Not only is there limited
carriage, but there is also limited financial support. While a channel
like ESPN is paid over $7.00 per month per subscriber by MVPDs, minority
channels receive pennies. What's more, minority networks are often
placed on premium tiers requiring an additional payment from the
consumer which also limits potential advertising revenues by limiting
potential audience reach."
Wheeler's letter, posted to the FCC website yesterday, was a response to US Reps. Juan Vargas (D-Calif.) and John Delaney (D-N.J.), who previously asked Wheeler
to arrange for "peer-reviewed studies" on the topics of "diversity of
programming, independent and minority television programming,
content protection and consumer privacy." (Separately, House Republicans
are attempting to pass legislation that would delay the proceeding by requiring further study.)
But the FCC has already held a public comment period that
drew more than 100,000 comments and the submission of numerous
"theoretical economic studies," making it the "most complete and
thorough examination of this issue ever undertaken or contemplated,"
Wheeler wrote.
The FCC has received numerous "comments from minority
programmers who have been locked out from carriage on traditional cable
networks," Wheeler wrote. (Here are someexamplescited by Wheeler.)
Wheeler argued that competition in set-top boxes would lead
to new interfaces, search functions, and integration of programming
sources, making it easier for independent and minority programmers to
find audiences. (Devices enabled by the FCC proposal could display
traditional pay-TV content alongside online streaming video, letting
consumers watch more types of programming from a single device.)
The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) told the FCC that
most minority-owned and independent programmers oppose the set-top box
plan. One of those is TV One, which makes shows for black audiences.
"[N]iche and minority programming already have a difficult
time securing a position that will result in higher exposure, and there
is no reason to believe that, unbound by contractual requirements, a
competitive interface will choose to make minority-owned and
minority-targeted programming more prominent in guides or
search results," TV One told the FCC.
"Indeed, there is no reason to believe that these box manufacturers
will even select any additional minority-themed programming for
inclusion in their interface at all." (TV One was previously co-owned by
Comcast until the cable company's stake was purchased by Radio One last year.)
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus have also criticized
Wheeler's plan. Black Entertainment Television CEO Debra Lee recently
said that the FCC proposal would give away "BET programming for
free." Wheeler's letter responded to this claim, saying, "I can assure
you nothing in the proposal would require anyone to give away their
content for free. If there is specific language you or Ms. Lee would
like to suggest to make that clear, we are interested in seeing
this language."
Wheeler also responded to claims that his plan would erode
copyright protections. "If copyright can be protected on Smart TVs,
iPads, and iPhones, there is little reason to expect it cannot similarly
be protected on a third-party set-top-box or app," Wheeler wrote.
Comments
Post a Comment