Washington State Attorney General Bob
Ferguson today announced a $100 million consumer protection lawsuit
against Comcast, alleging that the nation's biggest cable company
"engag[ed] in a pattern of deceptive practices constituting more than
1.8 million individual violations of the Washington Consumer Protection
Act." Comcast's conduct affected about 500,000 customers who purchased
service protection plans in Washington, Ferguson said.
State officials filed the lawsuit (
full text)
in King County Superior Court, seeking refunds for consumers. The
"lawsuit accuses Comcast of misleading 500,000 Washington consumers and
deceiving them into paying at least $73 million in subscription fees
over the last five years for a near-worthless 'protection plan' without
disclosing its significant limitations," the state AG's announcement
said. "Customers who sign up for Comcast’s Service Protection Plan pay a
$4.99 monthly fee ostensibly to avoid being charged if a Comcast
technician visits their home to fix an issue covered by the plan."
Washington said it alleges 1.8 million
violations because Comcast made false claims regarding the scope of its
service protection plans to 700,000 customers, and "deceptively
represented the scope of its Customer Guarantee to over 1.17 million
Washington consumers." Comcast allegedly led customers to believe that
they needed to buy service protection plans to get services that were
actually covered for free by the "Customer Guarantee."
Comcast routinely claimed that the
$5-per-month plan covered the cost of all service calls, but "did not
appropriately disclose that the plan does not cover repairs to any
'wall-fished' wiring—wiring inside a wall—which constitutes the vast
majority of wiring inside homes," the AG's announcement said.
Comcast will "vigorously defend" itself
against the lawsuit, a Comcast spokesperson told Ars. The company hadn't
yet seen the complaint when contacted by Ars, but said that it is
surprised by the lawsuit because Comcast has addressed the problems
raised by the attorney general.
“The Service Protection Plan has given those
Washington consumers who chose to purchase it great value by completely
covering over 99 percent of their repair calls," Comcast said. "We
worked with the Attorney General’s office to address every issue they
raised, and we made several improvements based on their input. Given
that we were committed to continue working collaboratively with the
Attorney General’s office, we’re surprised and disappointed that they
have instead chosen litigation. We stand behind our products and
services and will vigorously defend ourselves.”
Comcast's claim that its plan covers 99
percent of repair calls doesn't change the fact that it made deceptive
promises to customers, Ferguson said. "You cannot be deceptive in how
you promote a product, period," he said.
Ferguson said he filed the lawsuit because
negotiations with Comcast didn't produce a satisfactory settlement. To
avoid litigation, Ferguson said Comcast would have needed to offer
enough money to address the harm caused to consumers and the gravity of
the deception.
The lawsuit also accuses Comcast of credit
check violations, saying the company "improperly obtained a deposit from
over 6,000 Washington consumers."
"New Comcast customers must undergo a credit
screening prior to obtaining services unless they pay Comcast a deposit
to avoid the screening," the lawsuit said. "Comcast also requires
customers to pay a deposit if the credit screening process reveals the
customer has a low credit score. However, Comcast obtained a deposit
from thousands of Washington customers with high credit scores,
revealing that they improperly ran credit checks on customers who paid a
deposit to avoid the credit check, and/or improperly collected
deposits from customers who were not required to pay a deposit."
Comments
Post a Comment