Apple sued Qualcomm today,
alleging that the mobile chip giant owes it at least a billion dollars
in unpaid rebates and agreements. Apple further states that Qualcomm
“attempted to extort Apple into changing its responses and providing
false information to the KFTC [Korean FTC] in exchange for Qualcomm’s
release of those payments to Apple.”
That’s a bombshell accusation, if true. The Korean FTC
recently fined
Qualcomm $850 million, but an accusation that Qualcomm may have
deliberately attempted to pay other corporations to lie on its behalf
could open Qualcomm up to criminal lawsuits and accusations of perjury.
China has also fined Qualcomm for its alleged monopolistic abuses and
the FTC filed a lawsuit against QC earlier this week.
Apple provided Ars Technica with the following
statement:
For many years Qualcomm has unfairly insisted
on charging royalties for technologies they have nothing to do with. The
more Apple innovates with unique features such as TouchID, advanced
displays, and cameras, to name just a few, the more money Qualcomm
collects for no reason and the more expensive it becomes for Apple to
fund these innovations. Qualcomm built its business on older, legacy
standards but reinforces its dominance through exclusionary tactics and
excessive royalties. Despite being just one of over a dozen companies
who contributed to basic cellular standards, Qualcomm insists on
charging Apple at least five times more in payments than all the other
cellular patent licensors we have agreements with combined. To protect
this business scheme Qualcomm has taken increasingly radical steps, most
recently withholding nearly $1B in payments from Apple as retaliation
for responding truthfully to law enforcement agencies investigating
them.
Apple believes deeply in innovation and we
have always been willing to pay fair and reasonable rates for patents we
use. We are extremely disappointed in the way Qualcomm is conducting
its business with us and unfortunately after years of disagreement over
what constitutes a fair and reasonable royalty we have no choice left
but to turn to the courts.
Among Apple’s complaints, are allegations that
it is forced to effectively double-pay Qualcomm, since Qualcomm
requires Apple’s manufacturing partners to take out a license to work
with Snapdragon hardware, then charges Apple again for a separate
license. According to Apple, Qualcomm sweetened the deal with rebates so
long as Apple maintained exclusivity — which actually sounds a fair bit
like the rebate practices Intel used to artificially deny and reduce
AMD’s ability to win product designs from 2002 – 2006. In this case,
however, it was Intel’s modem that allowed Apple to break Qualcomm’s
lock on its LTE business. This also explains why Apple used Intel in the
first place, given that Intel’s modem
isn’t as good as Qualcomm’s according to objective analysis.
Apple’s suit alleges that Qualcomm breached
its contracts, abused its monopoly power, and violated California
contract law. It also claims Apple was overcharged and required to
license nine separate patents that Apple does not believe it infringed
upon. If this case is anything like the long-running Apple / Samsung
litigation, it’ll be years before it goes to trial and years after that
until a verdict and damages amount is settled — but throwing another
lawsuit shines an unwelcome spotlight on its business practices and
policies.
Comments
Post a Comment