on
Italy
- Get link
- Other Apps
The moon as it exists today is as desolate as planetoids come. It’s airless, geologically inert, and there’s no magnetic field. However, we know from the study of moon rocks brought back by the Apollo missions that the moon did once have a magnetic field. Scientists haven’t known why before, but they’re starting to piece it together. An inter-university team suggests that the moon’s mantle was once a tumultuous sea of magma.
Earth’s magnetic field is vital to our survival. While the sun offers life-giving energy, it also spews out radiation that could fry most living things. The magnetic field protects us from the sun’s more damaging effects. In order for a planet (or moon) to have a magnetic field, it has to have motion, liquid, and electrical conductivity. Earth gets these from its shifting molten core, so it might be tempting to assume the moon’s core was tasty when it was younger. Not so fast, say scientists.
The problem with the moon’s magnetic field is that its core is small — far too small to be responsible for the intense magnetic field predicted by analyzing moon rocks. Based on that testing, scientists know the moon’s magnetic field was intact until about 3.5 billion years ago, then it tapered off to almost nothing today. Today’s moon only has the slightest magnetic effects from magnetic elements in the crust, so that’s out, too.
The team created models to explain how the core could produce a powerful magnetic field, but none of them worked right. That’s when they took a different approach. If the moon had a shifting, molten mantle — the layer outside the core and under the crust — it might be able to generate a powerful magnetic field because it has greater volume and is closer to the surface. After plugging this into the model, the effect was dead-on.
If the researchers assumed a metal-rich mantle on the moon that circulated just above the core, the model produced the right kind of magnetic field to match moon rocks. This magma ocean hypothesis could also explain why the moon’s magnetic field faded away. The mantle would cool and solidify faster than the core, so the magnetic field disappeared as the mantle stopped churning.
The magma ocean idea fits the available data, but it’s still based on a model. Scientists might be able to confirm it by performing more magnetic measurements on moon rocks, but the best data would come from examining the moon’s mantle directly. Maybe one day.
By Ryan Whitwam
Earth’s magnetic field is vital to our survival. While the sun offers life-giving energy, it also spews out radiation that could fry most living things. The magnetic field protects us from the sun’s more damaging effects. In order for a planet (or moon) to have a magnetic field, it has to have motion, liquid, and electrical conductivity. Earth gets these from its shifting molten core, so it might be tempting to assume the moon’s core was tasty when it was younger. Not so fast, say scientists.
The problem with the moon’s magnetic field is that its core is small — far too small to be responsible for the intense magnetic field predicted by analyzing moon rocks. Based on that testing, scientists know the moon’s magnetic field was intact until about 3.5 billion years ago, then it tapered off to almost nothing today. Today’s moon only has the slightest magnetic effects from magnetic elements in the crust, so that’s out, too.
The team created models to explain how the core could produce a powerful magnetic field, but none of them worked right. That’s when they took a different approach. If the moon had a shifting, molten mantle — the layer outside the core and under the crust — it might be able to generate a powerful magnetic field because it has greater volume and is closer to the surface. After plugging this into the model, the effect was dead-on.
If the researchers assumed a metal-rich mantle on the moon that circulated just above the core, the model produced the right kind of magnetic field to match moon rocks. This magma ocean hypothesis could also explain why the moon’s magnetic field faded away. The mantle would cool and solidify faster than the core, so the magnetic field disappeared as the mantle stopped churning.
The magma ocean idea fits the available data, but it’s still based on a model. Scientists might be able to confirm it by performing more magnetic measurements on moon rocks, but the best data would come from examining the moon’s mantle directly. Maybe one day.
By Ryan Whitwam
Comments
Post a Comment